Comparative Analysis of Serverless Container Service Performance Between Google Cloud Run and AWS App Runner in Cross-Cloud Architecture

Muhammad Adithya Pratama; Odi Nurdiawan; Arif Rinaldi Dikananda; Denni Pratama; Dian Ade Kurnia

doi:10.59934/jaiea.v5i2.1919

Authors

Muhammad Adithya Pratama STMIK IKMI Cirebon
Odi Nurdiawan STMIK IKMI Cirebon
Arif Rinaldi Dikananda STMIK IKMI Cirebon
Denni Pratama STMIK IKMI Cirebon
Dian Ade Kurnia STMIK IKMI Cirebon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59934/jaiea.v5i2.1919

Keywords:

App Runner, Cloud Run, Cross-Cloud, Serverless

Abstract

Research on the performance of serverless container services is becoming increasingly important as the need for modern distributed and cross-cloud architectures grows. This study analyzes the performance of two leading serverless services, Google Cloud Run and AWS App Runner, in a cross-cloud architecture scenario. Testing was conducted using identical parameters, including container configuration, region, memory, vCPU, and concurrency. Performance testing included p95 latency, throughput, and error rate metrics using loads of up to 1000 virtual users. The results showed that Google Cloud Run provided more stable performance with p95 latency of 47–71 ms, throughput of 436–438 RPS, and 0% error rate. In contrast, AWS App Runner showed p95 latency of 490–651 ms with throughput variation of 388–410 RPS and an error rate of 2–4.41%. The difference in performance was due to autoscaling mechanisms, cross-cloud communication overhead, and resource contention. This study provides empirical evidence for selecting the optimal serverless service for distributed architectures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Barrak, F. Petrillo, and F. Jaafar, “Serverless on machine learning: A systematic mapping study,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 99337–99352, 2022.

M. Golec et al., “Cold Start Latency in Serverless Computing: A Systematic Review, Taxonomy, and Future Directions,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.08437, 2023, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2310.08437.

J. Wen et al., “SuperFlow: Performance Testing for Serverless Computing,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.01620, 2023, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2306.01620.

S. Kaiser, A. Tosun, and T. Korkmaz, “Benchmarking container technologies on ARM-based edge devices,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 107331–107347, 2023.

J. Jeon, S. Park, B. Jeong, and Y. Jeong, “Efficient container scheduling with hybrid deep learning,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 65166–65177, 2024.

M. Usman, S. Ferlin, A. Brunström, and J. Taheri, “A survey on observability of distributed edge & container-based microservices,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 86904–86919, 2022.

Á. Sofia, D. Dykeman, P. Urbanetz, A. Galal, and D. Dave, “Dynamic, context-aware cross-layer orchestration of containerized applications,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 93129–93150, 2023.

A. Garbugli, A. Sabbioni, A. Corradi, and P. Bellavista, “TEMPOS: QoS management middleware for edge cloud computing FaaS,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 49114–49127, 202.