Student's Perceived Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Their Academic Assignment Behaviors: A Qualitative Study Among Electronics Engineering Students

Authors

  • Thatia Zatillah Daradespa Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya
  • Zidni Ma’ruf Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya
  • Muhammad Ridwan Syahputra Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya
  • Aditya Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya
  • Aulia Ramadhani Sakinah Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59934/jaiea.v5i3.2482

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Generative AI, Academic Assignment Behaviors, Student Perceptions, Qualitative Study, Electronics Engineering Students, Higher Education.

Abstract

In higher education, the rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology has significantly transformed the way students approach learning and finish their assignments. Students are increasingly relying on AI-powered tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and other generative AI applications to assist with tasks like gathering information, developing ideas, solving problems, and completing assignments. While these devices offer numerous educational benefits, concerns have emerged regarding their potential impact on students’ academic honesty, ability to think critically, and study habits. The aim of this study is to explore how students studying Electronics Engineering view the impact of artificial intelligence on their approach to completing academic assignments. To fully understand students’ perspectives and experiences regarding the use of AI in academic environments, a qualitative research approach was employed. Six students majoring in Electronics Engineering took part in semi-structured interviews to collect data. The gathered information was then analyzed using thematic analysis, a process that involved reducing the data, organizing it into patterns, and preparing the final conclusions. Four key themes came up from the analysis: AI as a tool to support learning, the boost in productivity and efficiency when completing tasks, concerns about becoming too dependent on AI and losing critical thinking skills, and ethical issues related to academic honesty and the originality of work. The findings indicate that students generally see AI as a helpful tool that enhances learning effectiveness, helps finish assignments more quickly, and makes course content easier to grasp. Participants knew about the potential risks of depending too much on AI, including reduced motivation for independent learning and challenges in maintaining proper ethical standards in academic work. The study concludes that AI significantly and intricately influences how students approach their academic assignments. It raises important ethical and responsible usage concerns while simultaneously providing considerable educational advantages. Therefore, to ensure that AI functions as a supportive learning aid that boosts rather than diminishes students’ critical thinking and ability to learn independently, higher education institutions must establish clear guidelines and promote digital literacy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

C. K. Y. Chan and W. Hu, “Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education,” International

Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s41239-024-00430-z.

A. Tlili, B. Shehata, M. A. Adarkwah, A. Bozkurt, D. T. Hickey, R. Huang, and B. Agyemang, “What if the devil is my guardian angel:

ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education,” Smart Learning Environments, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 15–29, 2023, doi:

1186/s40561-023-00237-x.

E. Kasneci, K. Sessler, S. Küchemann, M. Bannert, D. Dementieva, F. Fischer, et al., “ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and

challenges of large language models for education,” Learning and Individual Differences, vol. 103, Art. no. 102274, 2023, doi:

1016/j.lindif.2023.102274.

D. R. E. Cotton, P. A. Cotton, and J. R. Shipway, “Chatting and cheating? Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT,”

Innovations in Education and Teaching International, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 228–239, 2024, doi: 10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148.

Y. K. Dwivedi, N. Kshetri, L. Hughes, E. L. Slade, A. Jeyaraj, A. K. Kar, et al., “So what if ChatGPT wrote it? Multidisciplinary

perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI,” International Journal of Information

Management, vol. 71, Art. no. 102642, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642.

C. K. Lo, “What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature,” Education Sciences, vol. 13, no. 4, Art. no.

, 2023, doi: 10.3390/educsci13040410.

D. Baidoo-Anu and L. Owusu Ansah, “Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential

benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning,” Journal of AI, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 52–62, 2023.

M. Farrokhnia, S. K. Banihashem, O. Noroozi, and A. Wals, “A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT in higher education,” Education and

Information Technologies, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 1–22, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-12111-5.

W. M. Lim, A. N. Gunasekara, J. L. Pallant, J. I. Pallant, and E. Pechenkina, “Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnarök or

reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators,” International Journal of Management Education, vol. 21, no. 2,

Art. no. 100790, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100790.

M. Sallam, “ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: Systematic review on the promising perspectives and

valid concerns,” Healthcare, vol. 11, no. 6, Art. no. 887, 2023, doi: 10.3390/healthcare11060887.

J. Rudolph, S. Tan, and S. Tan, “ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?” Journal of

Applied Learning and Teaching, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 342–363, 2023, doi: 10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9.

X. Zhai, “ChatGPT user experience: Implications for education,” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2023, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4312418.

M. A. AlAfnan, S. Dishari, M. Jovic, and K. Lomidze, “ChatGPT as an educational tool: Opportunities, challenges, and

recommendations for communication, business writing, and composition courses,” Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology, vol.

, no. 2, pp. 60–68, 2023.

R. Kumar and A. Raman, “Generative AI and student learning behavior in higher education institutions,” Education and Information

Technologies, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 5671–5692, 2024.

S. E. Eaton, “Artificial intelligence and academic integrity: Fundamental questions for educators,” International Journal for

Educational Integrity, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s40979-023-00144-4.

M. Perkins, “Academic integrity considerations of AI large language models in higher education,” Journal of University Teaching

and Learning Practice, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1–12, 2023.

UNESCO, Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research. Paris, France: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural

Organization, 2023.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-19

How to Cite

Thatia Zatillah Daradespa, Zidni Ma’ruf, Muhammad Ridwan Syahputra, Aditya, & Aulia Ramadhani Sakinah. (2026). Student’s Perceived Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Their Academic Assignment Behaviors: A Qualitative Study Among Electronics Engineering Students. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Engineering Applications (JAIEA), 5(3), 4621–4628. https://doi.org/10.59934/jaiea.v5i3.2482

Issue

Section

Articles