Track Record Model in Employee Performance Optimization Using Weight Product Method

Authors

  • Safrizal Politeknik Gihon
  • Lili Tanti Universitas Potensi Utama
  • Dio Febrian Surbakti STMIK KAPUTAMA
  • Nurainun STMIK KAPUTAMA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59934/jaiea.v4i2.721

Keywords:

Weighted Product (WP), Employee Performance Model, Decision Support System, Criterion-related Validity, Internal Reliability.

Abstract

Employee performance improvement is a crucial aspect for the growth and success of a company, especially in the agricultural sector that relies on the quality and competence of human resources. However, subjective and manual employee assessments often face challenges, such as high levels of subjectivity and the time required to complete the process. To overcome these obstacles, this study proposes the use of the Weighted Product (WP) method as an approach to building a track record model in employee performance assessment. This study involves several methodological stages, first by studying the literature related to decision support systems, WP methods, track records, and employee performance assessments. Furthermore, data collection is carried out from a dataset that includes monthly assessments of employee performance based on several criteria such as attendance, cooperation, work quantity, responsibility, and others. The next process involves modeling, where the WP model is designed to produce the maximum total value of the existing assessment criteria. Model validation is carried out through two approaches, namely the Criterion-related Validity Test and the Internal Consistency Test. The test results show that the WP model has a Criterion-related Validity of 0.9851, indicating a strong relationship between the employee scores generated and the assessments given by the supervisor. In addition, Cronbach's alpha reached a value of 1.0, indicating excellent internal reliability of the model. Thus, the use of the WP method in the employee performance tracking system can be considered effective and can improve objectivity and efficiency in employee performance assessment in the context of agricultural companies. This method not only helps in identifying high-performing employees, but also in motivating them to achieve the highest performance standards, which in turn can improve the overall operational quality and reputation of the company

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Y. Y. Thanri, ‘Rekam Jejak Kinerja Crew Sebagai Model Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pengangkatan Leader’, J. MEDIA Inform. BUDIDARMA, vol. 4, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.30865/mib.v4i1.1785.

S. Safrizal, ‘Rekam Jejak Dosen Sebagai Model Pengambilan Keputusan Dalam Pemilihan Dosen Berprestasi’, Creat. Inf. Technol. J., vol. 2, no. 1, 2015, doi: 10.24076/citec.2014v2i1.38.

L. Tanti, Safrizal, M. A. E. Nasution, R. Puspasari, B. S. Riza, and J. Indriani, ‘Modeling of Decision Support System as an Assistant Tool in Selecting Health Equipment Suppliers with TOPSIS Method’, 2021, doi: 10.1109/CITSM52892.2021.9588818.

‘Decision support system for determining the location of Iwang restaurant branches using weight product method’, J. Math. Comput. Sci., 2021, doi: 10.28919/jmcs/5464.

R. Susanto and A. D. Andriana, ‘Employee Recruitment Analysis using Computer Based Weighted Product Model’, in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2019, vol. 662, no. 2, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/662/2/022049.

L. J. Satriani, H. A. Wulandari, P. N. Arifa, and I. Tahyudin, ‘Weighted Product Method in the DSS for Employee rewards at the Cosmetics Warehouse’, Internet Things Artif. Intell. J., vol. 2, no. 3, 2023, doi: 10.31763/iota.v2i3.567.

R. Ramadiani, S. Adithama, and M. L. Jundillah, ‘Selecting goldfish broods use the weighted product and simple additive weighting methods’, IAES Int. J. Artif. Intell., vol. 11, no. 4, 2022, doi: 10.11591/ijai.v11.i4.pp1405-1413.

D. Wira Trise Putra and A. Agustian Punggara, ‘Comparison Analysis of Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Weigthed Product (WP) in Decision Support Systems’, in MATEC Web of Conferences, 2018, vol. 215, doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201821501003.

H. Sari and R Mahdalena Simanjorang, ‘Electronic Credit and Furniture Decision Support Systems Using the Weighted Product Method’, Int. J. Basic Appl. Sci., vol. 10, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.35335/ijobas.v10i1.5.

D. Mayorga-Vega, C. Casado-Robles, S. Guijarro-Romero, and J. Viciana, ‘Criterion-Related Validity of Consumer-Wearable Activity Trackers for Estimating Steps in Primary Schoolchildren under Controlled Conditions: Fit-Person Study’, J. Sport. Sci. Med., vol. 23, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.52082/jssm.2024.79.

S. F. Hsu, H. Y. Lin, Y. T. Wu, N. C. Liao, W. H. Yu, and E. C. Chiu, ‘Test–Retest Reliability, Criterion-Related Validity, and Ecological Validity of the Test of Visual–Motor Skills, Third Edition, in Kindergarten Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder’, Am. J. Occup. Ther., vol. 78, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.5014/ajot.2024.050206.

X. Li and J. Liu, ‘Validating a critical thinking ability questionnaire for EFL learners’, Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 51, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101442.

C. Zhang, B. Dai, and L. Lin, ‘Validation of a Chinese Version of the Digital Stress Scale and Development of a Short Form Based on Item Response Theory Among Chinese College Students’, Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag., vol. 16, 2023, doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S413162.

Á. Roco-Videla, S. V. Flores, M. Olguin-Barraza, and N. Maureira-Carsalade, ‘ALPHA DE CRONBACH Y SU INTERVALO DE CONFIANZA’, Nutricion Hospitalaria, vol. 41, no. 1. 2024, doi: 10.20960/nh.04961.

I. Kennedy, ‘Sample Size Determination in Test-Retest and Cronbach Alpha Reliability Estimates’, Br. J. Contemp. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.52589/bjce-fy266hk9.

Jumailiyah, ‘Pengaruh Kualitas Item Terhadap Reliabilitas Alpha Cronbach Pada Tes Bakat Numerikal Dan Tes Potensi Akademik’, J. Ilm. IKIP Mataram, vol. 4, no. 1, 2018.

H. Park, ‘Reliability using Cronbach alpha in sample survey’, Korean J. Appl. Stat., vol. 34, no. 1, 2021.

M. Amirrudin, K. Nasution, and S. Supahar, ‘Effect of Variability on Cronbach Alpha Reliability in Research Practice’, J. Mat. Stat. dan Komputasi, vol. 17, no. 2, 2020, doi: 10.20956/jmsk.v17i2.11655.

N. Hassanpour, A. Shaemi Barzoki, M. H. Moshref Javadi, and A. Safari, ‘Designing employee performance evaluation model in Isfahan municipality: an interorganizational experience’, Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag., vol. 71, no. 6, 2022, doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-08-2020-0411.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-15

How to Cite

Safrizal, Lili Tanti, Surbakti, D. F., & Nurainun. (2025). Track Record Model in Employee Performance Optimization Using Weight Product Method. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Engineering Applications (JAIEA), 4(2), 639–647. https://doi.org/10.59934/jaiea.v4i2.721