Comparison Of AHP And Topsis Methods In Determining Scholarships For Elementary School Students

Authors

  • Efansius Tarigan STIKOM Tunas Bangsa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53842/jaiea.v1i2.82

Keywords:

Education, AHP, Topsis, Scholarship

Abstract

The regional coordinator of the Siantar sub-district is the education office in the Siantar sub-district. The office is used to store elementary school student data in the Siantar sub-district before it is submitted to the education office in Simalungun district. In collecting data on students in each school, employees sometimes find it difficult to filter out which students have the highest grades in each elementary school and determine who deserves assistance from the Simalungun Regency Government for those who excel. Therefore, the comparison of the AHP and TOPSIS methods in determining the scholarships for elementary school students at the Siantar District Regional Coordinator is to carry out a ranking of alternatives in the form of student data. The AHP and TOPSIS methods are compared because this method determines the weight value for each attribute, which is followed by ranking a number of available options and then re-selected to find the best choice.

References

S. Maesyaroh, “Analisis Perbandingan Metode AHP dan TOPSIS Dalam Pemilihan Asisten Laboratorium di FKOM UNIKU,” NUANSA Inform., vol. 14, p. 17, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.25134/nuansa.v14i2.2913.

M. M. D. Widianta, T. Rizaldi, D. P. S. Setyohadi, and H. Y. Riskiawan, “Comparison of Multi-Criteria Decision Support Methods (AHP, TOPSIS, SAW & PROMENTHEE) for Employee Placement,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 953, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/953/1/012116.

P. T. K. Adi, E. Sugiharti, and A. Alamsyah, “Comparison Between SAW and TOPSIS Methods in Selection of Broiler Chicken Meat Quality,” Sci. J. Informatics, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 90, 2018, doi: 10.15294/sji.v5i1.14416.

H. H. Azwir, F. Hasan, and H. Oemar, “Supplier Selection Of Upper Arm And Lower Arm Pantograph Jack Using AHP And TOPSIS Methods,” J. Rekayasa Sist. Ind., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2020, doi: 10.26593/jrsi.v9i1.3423.1-10.

I. Wahyudi, S. Bahri, and P. Handayani, “Aplikasi Pembelajaran Pengenalan Budaya Indonesia,” vol. V, no. 1, pp. 135–138, 2019, doi: 10.31294/jtk.v4i2.

Saputra, Budhi, A. I. Made, Wardoyo, and Retantyo, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kelompok Penentuan Karyawan Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Topsis dan Borda,” IJCCS (Indonesian J. Comput. Cybern. Syst., vol. 11, no. 2, p. 165, 2017.

C. Erdin and H. E. Akbaş, “A comparative analysis of fuzzy TOPSIS and geographic information systems (GIS) for the location selection of shopping malls: A case study from Turkey,” Sustain., vol. 11, no. 14, pp. 1–22, 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11143837.

S. Soleman, “Decision Support System for Employee Candidate Selection using AHP and PM Methods,” vol. 10, pp. 220–231, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.14569/IJACSA.2019.0101130.

E. Önder and S. Dag, “Combining Analytical Hierarchy Process And TOPSIS Approaches For Supplier Selection In A Cable Company,” JBEF, vol. 2, Jan. 2013.

A. Jozaghi et al., “A comparative study of the AHP and TOPSIS techniques for dam site selection using GIS: A case study of Sistan and Baluchestan Province, Iran,” Geosci., vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 1–23, 2018, doi: 10.3390/geosciences8120494.

Downloads

Published

2022-02-09

How to Cite

Efansius Tarigan. (2022). Comparison Of AHP And Topsis Methods In Determining Scholarships For Elementary School Students. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Engineering Applications (JAIEA), 1(2), 151–157. https://doi.org/10.53842/jaiea.v1i2.82