Application Of The C4.5 Algorithm To Determining Student's Level Of Understanding
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59934/jaiea.v1i2.84Keywords:
Data Mining; Algorithm C4.5; Rule, Level of Understanding; StudentsAbstract
This research was conducted to find the rules of the model in measuring the level of students' understanding of the subject. During this pandemic, the learning process is carried out online, so it is difficult to measure students' ability to master the material. This measurement needs to be done so that the evaluation process can be carried out so that the ability of students in one group to achieve the target level of understanding. Currently, evaluation activities have never been carried out because they do not have a model so that evaluation can only be done by giving quizzes and exercises. This problem can be solved by using data mining algorithm C4.5. Attributes used as parameters for assessing student understanding of lessons such as Teaching Method (C1), Learning Media (C2), Communication (C3), Experience (C4), Teaching Materials/Modules/Assignments (C5), Learning Duration (C6). The six attributes are used to find the relationship between each other that influence each other to get the highest root so that a decision tree will be obtained that produces the rules of the relationship between each attribute in determining student understanding of the subject. This rule or rule will be used as the basis for making an information system so that it can be applied to end users, namely schools.
Downloads
References
W. Yadiati and Meiryani, “The role of information technology in E-Commerce,” Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 173–176, 2019.
W. Cascio and R. Montealegre, “How Technology Is Changing Work and Organizations,” Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., vol. 3, pp. 349–375, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062352.
M. A. Saleh, S. Palaniappan, N. Ali, and A. Abdalla, “Education is An Overview of Data Mining and The Ability to Predict the Performance of Students,” vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 19–28, 2021.
M. Pechenizkiy, T. Calders, E. Vasilyeva, and P. De Bra, Mining the Student Assessment Data: Lessons Drawn from a Small Scale Case Study. 2008.
S. Pisani, D. Fioriti, M. P. Conte, F. Chiarini, L. Seganti, and A. M. Degener, “Involvement of herpes simplex virus type 2 in modulation of gene expression of human papillomavirus type 18,” Int. J. Immunopathol. Pharmacol., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 59–63, 2002, doi: 10.1177/039463200201500108.
S. W. Siahaan, K. D. R. Sianipar, P. P. P. A. N. . F. Ilmi R.H Zer, and D. Hartama, “Application of C4.5 Algorithm in Improving English Skills in Students,” J. Inform. Univ. Pamulang, vol. 5, no. 3, p. 261, 2020, doi: 10.32493/informatika.v5i3.5268.
S. Sucipto, K. Kusrini, and E. Luthfi, Classification method of multi-class on C4.5 algorithm for fish diseases. 2016.
Rohmatillah, “A Study On Students’ Difficulties In Learning Vocabulary (Bachellors’ Degree),” J. Raden Intan Lampung, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 69–86, 2014, [Online]. Available: http://repository.unej.ac.id/handle/123456789/18942.
A. A. Aprilia Lestari, “Increasing Accuracy of C4 . 5 Algorithm Using Information Gain Ratio and Adaboost for Classification of Chronic Kidney Disease,” J. Soft Comput. Explor., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 32–38, 2020.
A. A. Septiantina and E. Sugiharti, “Optimization of C4 . 5 Algorithm Using K-Means Algorithm and Particle Swarm Optimization Feature Selection on Breast Cancer Diagnosis,” vol. 2, no. April, pp. 51–60, 2020.
A. B. U. Nájera and J. de la Calleja Mora, “Brief review of educational applications using data mining and machine learning,” Rev. Electron. Investig. Educ., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 84–96, 2017, doi: 10.24320/redie.2017.19.4.1305.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Engineering Applications (JAIEA)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.